Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Felony Jury Tampering--A Common Problem

This is a must-read article that discusses the jury-tampering scheme that is almost a daily occurrence in the U.S. Judges routinely 'instruct' juries to do as they say, and only consider narrow-scope considerations in trials, when it is commonly known (or should be commonly known) that the jury has the power to try the facts AND the validity of the law allegedly being applied. If you think about it, there would be no need for a jury if they were only there to determine the facts of the case without considering the law.

The whole purpose of the jury system is to restrict the powers of a runaway judicial and legislative system. It is to give the ultimate power back to the people, regardless of how judges and courts usurp unlawful power just because they have total control of the courts by the use of their standing army (known as the police). Judges are known to repeatedly break their oaths of office, and legislate from the bench, and practice law from the bench. The legislature has been known to pass 'laws' that are unconstitutional. The theory behind the jury system is to prevent these government lawbreakers from being able to enforce their bogus laws by having a knowledgable citizen population refuse to convict innocent people for unlawful reasons! This is the true intent of the institution of the citizen's jury.

The reason that the judges like to instruct the jury is so that they can (unlawfully) expand their powers. They don't want juries to know that they can (and should) judge the law as well as the facts of the case. When juries refuse to find people guilty of bad laws, eventually the courts realize that they cannot enforce their bogus laws. You should share this knowledge with people you know that serve on juries. But you'd better not tell the court people that you know this because they seek to keep informed jurors off of cases. You should also check out the web page for the Fully Informed Jury Association so that we can protect our rights.

No comments: