Thursday, July 20, 2006

Tragedy in Lebanon

I have been following the Israeli situation in general in reference to the NWO and related topics. But lately, the attacks on Lebanon have been making the front page news. I know that this is being orchestrated for hidden purposes and agendas, which is normally the case. The issue appears to be about Hezbollah and it's alleged terror attacks (which may also possibly be identified as a weak people fighting a leviathan in the only way that they can) that have culminated in their taking of 2 or 3 Israeli soldiers hostage. But to me, the response seems to be: 1) extremely disproportional to the threat, and 2) like it would have to have been planned in advance. I don't claim to be an expert on Middle Eastern affairs, but I'm not sure how big a threat Hezbollah and other alleged threats can be to mighty Israel, a country that is armed to the teeth, as well as possessing a large number of nuclear weapons. I believe that Israel has the 4th or 5th largest military on the planet, far more than what any of its neighboring countries would possess. It's like Mike Tyson cowering before Pee Wee Herman in fear. It just doesn't add up, and doesn't make sense.

I found a few articles that go into more depth about this complex situation. It would appear that the situation in the Middle East is worsening rapidly. It is obvious that the US government is working in conjunction with Israel and Britain. The first article speaks about how the Lebanese population is being devastated by aerial attacks. They are destroying civilian targets in response to this alleged perceived threat from Hezbollah, even though this organization (as far as I can tell) has no ties or official standing with the Lebanese government. If I remember correctly, the acts of bombing civilian targets and critical infrastructure locations are both war crimes. I thought that soldiers that are captured were not kidnapped, but were 'prisoners of war'. Soldiers can't be kidnapped, but civilians can. I also don't remember their being any declaration of war upon Lebanon by Israel, but I could be wrong about that. It just seems that Israel can do no wrong, no matter how many civilians they may happen to kill.

The second article speaks more on the geopolitical situation in the Middle East. This is not a topic with which I am the most familiar, but I felt that I should address this because it is a very important topic. In fact, some believe that it could affect the entire world, possibly initiating World War 3. Although I do not agree with everything the author says (especially the unproven 'conspiracy theory' assertion that 19 hijackers flew planes into the WTC and the Pentagon that is not backed up by any facts upon critical examination, especially when at least 7 of them are reportedly alive and well), I do believe that he makes some valid points and gives some pertinent background information about this Middle Eastern situation. There is an extreme Israeli bias in the reporting of the events occurring in this region. How could the reporters possibly know the motivations of the people who are acting in these battles? It is patently subjective. It would appear that forces are working to destabilize the entire region for their own purposes. Another great question is why the Israeli army is targeting Lebanese army positions when there is no connection between Hezbollah and the Lebanese government.

The third article is more of a potpourri of different snippets, opinions, and parts of articles that are placed together in a flowing fashion. The obvious effect of the Israeli strikes is to destabilize Lebanon and to inflame the Arabic population of the Middle East. How could any Arabic person not be enraged with the wholesale targeting, destruction and murder of innocent civilians? There is obviously a lot more going on behind the scenes than what we are being offered in the mainstream media 'news' sources. They are murdering scores of innocent people in Lebanon, no matter how vehemently stooge reporters claim that Israeli actions are merely 'self-defense'. Since when are women and children such a huge threat that bombs must be dropped on their heads while they are at home? There has to be more than meets the eye at work here. More intrigue in operation, as usual.

No comments: