We've all heard the reports about Seal Team 6 killing Osama Bin Laden. But to me, it sounds very fishy. The longer the time goes by, the more suspect the government's official story gets. The story just keeps changing by the moment.
The conflicts in the story just keep growing. It would appear that the official story is changing on a daily basis. And it doesn't make any sense. No proof, no rhyme, no reason, nothing... No body, photoshopped pictures, no eyewitnesses, nothing.
Over the years, I've heard reports that OBL was dead years ago. Some say that he had died from kidney failure, since he was known to be suffering from it before the WTC attacks. Others say that he had been killed in Tora Bora during the heavy bombing that was being conducted by the US military over there when they first invaded Afghanistan. It is even reported that the US knew he was dead. Benazir Bhutto said that she had heard from her sources that Bin Laden had been killed by Omar Sheikh. Ironically, she was assassinated about 2 months after saying this. Of course, it was just a coincidence...
In short, this is just too convenient. The timing is suspect. Obama's popularity ratings were probably as low as GW Bush's. This OBL thing is an obvious distraction to keep people engaged in the media circus. Also, this sets up the perfect pretext for new 'false flag' operations that can be blamed on Muslim extremists. No matter how much security we add, the 'terrorists' always seem to be able to circumvent it.
The oligarchs that carry out these sophisticated intelligence operations rely on the trusting nature of average people. They need people to believe what they are told by authority figures on television and from other media sources. They could not control society if people were smart enough to figure out the lies and inconsistencies in this biased mass media reporting.
Most people do not want to be perceived as being too 'far out' in their thinking and questioning of news reporting. The story being told in the mass media about this OBL assassination is more than 3 standard deviations of perceptive distance from the truth, so the truth is seen as being 'far out', and it is. But it is this way because it was designed to be this way.
Thursday, May 05, 2011
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Silver is Blowing Up
The price of silver is exploding more than it already has. I remember when silver was less than $5 an ounce. I couldn't convince people to think about it, much less actually buy some of it. I was buying it, but looking back, I should have mortgaged everything I had to buy it. I made at least 6-10 times my money I invested in silver. We will never see prices for silver that low in our lifetimes. NEVER! I guess that made it the investment of a lifetime back then.
Jump to 2011, and now the price of silver is close to $50 an ounce. The really scary part of this is that when you look at the fundamentals, along with the instability in the world economies today, the price of silver may still be low. The fact of the matter is that the banks that have been dealing with silver have been committing fraud. They have been 'selling short' silver that they not only did not own, but have actually been selling silver that did not exist. This enabled them to make money on non-existent silver, and to also suppress the price of silver as well. Selling naked shorts in silver amounts to a de facto flooding the market with 'paper' silver.
The problem now is that the banks are now caught up in a 'short squeeze'. This is when a seller of a commodity doesn't have it, and now much purchase it at the market price, no matter how high it may be. It would depend upon what price they sold it at that would determine the loss. The bigger the difference between the market price and the price they sold it for, the larger the loss. It looks like they may be in for multi-million dollar losses because the silver price is now approaching its historic high that was set back in the 1970's when the Hunt brothers were trying to corner the silver market.
I'm not sure how many people are open minded enough to invest in silver, but it has worked out great for me, and for plenty of other people who had enough guts to think for themselves instead of following the talking heads on MSNBC and other media investment pundits. One thing that they won't tell you is about systemic risk. You may think that your investment portfolio is well diversified because you're investing in a lot of different stocks, bonds, ETF's, indexes, etc., but I have some news for you. You're only diversified in paper assets. What happens if all paper assets take a hit? Is your portfolio equipped to handle that eventuality? That's where investment in non-paper assets comes in. Do your research.
Jump to 2011, and now the price of silver is close to $50 an ounce. The really scary part of this is that when you look at the fundamentals, along with the instability in the world economies today, the price of silver may still be low. The fact of the matter is that the banks that have been dealing with silver have been committing fraud. They have been 'selling short' silver that they not only did not own, but have actually been selling silver that did not exist. This enabled them to make money on non-existent silver, and to also suppress the price of silver as well. Selling naked shorts in silver amounts to a de facto flooding the market with 'paper' silver.
The problem now is that the banks are now caught up in a 'short squeeze'. This is when a seller of a commodity doesn't have it, and now much purchase it at the market price, no matter how high it may be. It would depend upon what price they sold it at that would determine the loss. The bigger the difference between the market price and the price they sold it for, the larger the loss. It looks like they may be in for multi-million dollar losses because the silver price is now approaching its historic high that was set back in the 1970's when the Hunt brothers were trying to corner the silver market.
I'm not sure how many people are open minded enough to invest in silver, but it has worked out great for me, and for plenty of other people who had enough guts to think for themselves instead of following the talking heads on MSNBC and other media investment pundits. One thing that they won't tell you is about systemic risk. You may think that your investment portfolio is well diversified because you're investing in a lot of different stocks, bonds, ETF's, indexes, etc., but I have some news for you. You're only diversified in paper assets. What happens if all paper assets take a hit? Is your portfolio equipped to handle that eventuality? That's where investment in non-paper assets comes in. Do your research.
Monday, April 18, 2011
Almost Half the Meat at the Supermarket is Contaminated!
I hated to see this, especially since I am a meat eater. I'm not surprised at this at all. The meat industry basically has the regulators in their 'back pocket'. That's why they get to add so many of the antibiotics to the animals. The overuse of the antibiotics is what leads to the bacteria being able to develop resistance to them. The meat producers love to use antibiotics because they can continue to use their filthy practices, as well as increase the growth rate of the animals.
Staphylococcus aureus is a common bacteria. It is scary to think that these bacteria in the meats we are consuming is drug-resistant! But that's a direct result of corporations choosing the most profitable practices over the most safe practices. It's not surprising if you truly understand what a corporation is.
A corporation is an artificial person. It's only reason for existence is to make money for owners (shareholders), and everything else is of relatively minor importance. They don't care about the effect of their foods on our long-term health. They don't care whether or not the food they feed us is healthy. They only care about whether or not we'll continue to buy it, and whether or not they'll make profits. That's why they never want to admit to anything that they think will make us less likely to buy their products, or to make us uncomfortable with their industry.
I'm not sure what we should do though, because beef, poultry and pork are all having this problem. Most people don't want to give up meat, but we're going to have to do something to protect ourselves, since we know that the big corporations will not protect us. It might be a good idea to get meats from small, local farmers instead of from the big supermarket chains. It may also be good to wash our meats with food grade hydrogen peroxide (diluted to 3%). We're going to have to be resourceful and intelligent.
Staphylococcus aureus is a common bacteria. It is scary to think that these bacteria in the meats we are consuming is drug-resistant! But that's a direct result of corporations choosing the most profitable practices over the most safe practices. It's not surprising if you truly understand what a corporation is.
A corporation is an artificial person. It's only reason for existence is to make money for owners (shareholders), and everything else is of relatively minor importance. They don't care about the effect of their foods on our long-term health. They don't care whether or not the food they feed us is healthy. They only care about whether or not we'll continue to buy it, and whether or not they'll make profits. That's why they never want to admit to anything that they think will make us less likely to buy their products, or to make us uncomfortable with their industry.
I'm not sure what we should do though, because beef, poultry and pork are all having this problem. Most people don't want to give up meat, but we're going to have to do something to protect ourselves, since we know that the big corporations will not protect us. It might be a good idea to get meats from small, local farmers instead of from the big supermarket chains. It may also be good to wash our meats with food grade hydrogen peroxide (diluted to 3%). We're going to have to be resourceful and intelligent.
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Fukushima Radiation is Reaching the US
In spite of the media and government reports that are downplaying the severity of the radiation releases from the Fukushima nuclear reactors, it is very dangerous. Much more dangerous than the authorities or media would like to admit. We already know that the government has a vested interest in having people remain calm and distracted from the facts. The nuclear industry is populated with big, powerful corporations that make a lot of money building nuclear power plants.
The EPA is reporting that there have been radionuclides found in drinking water in the United States, as well as radioactive contamination of milk. In fact, some levels of radioactive Iodine 131 in drinking water have been above the EPA safety limits! What is even worse is that there has also been contamination of milk with radioactivity. The issue with milk is that it represents the general condition of the food chain because cows eat grass and are exposed to the same environment as food crops and water supplies. The inference is that when there is radioactivity in cows' milk, there is radioactive contamination throughout the entire food supply.
With all of this radioactivity being spewed around the Earth by this nuclear accident, you would think that governments would be working to protect their populations, or at least would tell the people how to protect themselves. But this is not the case.
The authorities from most countries actually appear to be more concerned with lulling the people to sleep. They are focused on making sure that the people remain complacent about this nuclear fallout. Scientists agree that there is no safe exposure level for radioactive isotopes. Although the exposure levels may not appear to be high in the air or water, the thing about exposure to radionuclides is that the exposure is cumulative. It appears that the Fukushima nuclear plants will be releasing radiation and radioactive particles for many months, if not years. It has already been reported that they are releasing enormous amounts of radioactivity into the ocean. It is just a matter of time before the fish, shrimp and other sea creatures are contaminated with radioactive particles.
The astute person will want to take steps to remove radionuclides from the body. We may not be able to stop the release of radioactivity, but we can do some things to protect ourselves and our children from radioactive contamination. It makes sense to err on the side of caution, regardless of the opinion of government officials. If you wait for them to warn you of the danger of radioactivity, it may be too late.
The EPA is reporting that there have been radionuclides found in drinking water in the United States, as well as radioactive contamination of milk. In fact, some levels of radioactive Iodine 131 in drinking water have been above the EPA safety limits! What is even worse is that there has also been contamination of milk with radioactivity. The issue with milk is that it represents the general condition of the food chain because cows eat grass and are exposed to the same environment as food crops and water supplies. The inference is that when there is radioactivity in cows' milk, there is radioactive contamination throughout the entire food supply.
With all of this radioactivity being spewed around the Earth by this nuclear accident, you would think that governments would be working to protect their populations, or at least would tell the people how to protect themselves. But this is not the case.
The authorities from most countries actually appear to be more concerned with lulling the people to sleep. They are focused on making sure that the people remain complacent about this nuclear fallout. Scientists agree that there is no safe exposure level for radioactive isotopes. Although the exposure levels may not appear to be high in the air or water, the thing about exposure to radionuclides is that the exposure is cumulative. It appears that the Fukushima nuclear plants will be releasing radiation and radioactive particles for many months, if not years. It has already been reported that they are releasing enormous amounts of radioactivity into the ocean. It is just a matter of time before the fish, shrimp and other sea creatures are contaminated with radioactive particles.
The astute person will want to take steps to remove radionuclides from the body. We may not be able to stop the release of radioactivity, but we can do some things to protect ourselves and our children from radioactive contamination. It makes sense to err on the side of caution, regardless of the opinion of government officials. If you wait for them to warn you of the danger of radioactivity, it may be too late.
Thursday, March 31, 2011
GMO Hazards
The GMO debate is very controversial, but I think that the majority of people have an inherent understanding of the topic. This is why most people do not want to be exposed to GMO foods, and are understandably wary of consuming them in foods. The bottom line is that there is no way that genetically modified plants are the same as those that are naturally occurring!
When scientists start using restriction endonucleases (i.e., enzymes that cut DNA at a specific DNA base pair sequence) to cleave DNA, and then insert genes from different species into it, that sounds like the definition of Pandora's Box situation to me! Each type of living organism has a specific safety codon sequence that makes it impossible for different species to interbreed. Genetic scientists have learned how to bypass this. Because these types of experiments have never been done before, the experimental population could be considered to be everyone in the world.
A huge problem with this recombinant DNA technology is that there are often unintended consequences. When there are genes being inserted into bacteria, commonly-used plants, and all over the place, this can create a danger. There is no way to predict how artificially created genetically-modified organisms will interact with other organisms and the genetic results. A scary fact is that all sorts of different genes from different species are being spliced together.
The biggest push for the use of this recombinant DNA technology is from the corporations that stand to make immense profits from its use. Companies like Monsanto, a company that has already 'gifted' the world with Dioxin, PCB's, Agent Orange, aspartame, and DDT. So their claims for the safety of bioengineered organisms are not objective, since they stand to gain many billions (if not trillions) in profits from this technology.
The scariest thing about these genetically modified organisms is that once they are introduced into organism populations that are outside 'in the wild', there is virtually no way to remove them if they begin having harmful effects! In addition, there is virtually no regulation of the use of this technology. Scientists have done no long-term studies on GM organisms or foods. Political and economic considerations have been the major priority, with no consideration of the possibility of catastrophic consequences from such irresponsible behavior. This 'shoot from the hip' attitude with recombinant DNA technology could lead to massive death and destruction of life on this planet. This is how serious the consequences from these actions could be. We are hoping for the best, but it is bordering on insanity for recombinant DNA to be rolled out into nature in such a thoughtless manner.
When scientists start using restriction endonucleases (i.e., enzymes that cut DNA at a specific DNA base pair sequence) to cleave DNA, and then insert genes from different species into it, that sounds like the definition of Pandora's Box situation to me! Each type of living organism has a specific safety codon sequence that makes it impossible for different species to interbreed. Genetic scientists have learned how to bypass this. Because these types of experiments have never been done before, the experimental population could be considered to be everyone in the world.
A huge problem with this recombinant DNA technology is that there are often unintended consequences. When there are genes being inserted into bacteria, commonly-used plants, and all over the place, this can create a danger. There is no way to predict how artificially created genetically-modified organisms will interact with other organisms and the genetic results. A scary fact is that all sorts of different genes from different species are being spliced together.
The biggest push for the use of this recombinant DNA technology is from the corporations that stand to make immense profits from its use. Companies like Monsanto, a company that has already 'gifted' the world with Dioxin, PCB's, Agent Orange, aspartame, and DDT. So their claims for the safety of bioengineered organisms are not objective, since they stand to gain many billions (if not trillions) in profits from this technology.
The scariest thing about these genetically modified organisms is that once they are introduced into organism populations that are outside 'in the wild', there is virtually no way to remove them if they begin having harmful effects! In addition, there is virtually no regulation of the use of this technology. Scientists have done no long-term studies on GM organisms or foods. Political and economic considerations have been the major priority, with no consideration of the possibility of catastrophic consequences from such irresponsible behavior. This 'shoot from the hip' attitude with recombinant DNA technology could lead to massive death and destruction of life on this planet. This is how serious the consequences from these actions could be. We are hoping for the best, but it is bordering on insanity for recombinant DNA to be rolled out into nature in such a thoughtless manner.
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Is This the Biggest Threat to Your Health?
The biggest threat to your health may be a molecule that we've never thought was so dangerous. It has just been implicated in diabetes, hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases, obesity, and a host of other health problems. The molecule I'm talking about is fructose, and it is very ugly in its action on the human body, especially when taken in excess.
The major problem is that the modern Standard American Diet is rife full of fructose, and especially High Fructose Corn Syrup. It is as if there is some sort of plan to make all Americans dependent upon this sweetener. It is in all sorts of food products, and is even in many foods that you may not suspect, such as ketchup, bologna, bread, etc. This is such an important topic that I'm going to stop writing and let you watch and hear the story for yourself from credentialed medical professionals.
The major problem is that the modern Standard American Diet is rife full of fructose, and especially High Fructose Corn Syrup. It is as if there is some sort of plan to make all Americans dependent upon this sweetener. It is in all sorts of food products, and is even in many foods that you may not suspect, such as ketchup, bologna, bread, etc. This is such an important topic that I'm going to stop writing and let you watch and hear the story for yourself from credentialed medical professionals.
Sunday, April 25, 2010
You Have to See These Videos
This is Ring of Power-Part 3, and is in 2 parts. They bring up a lot of good ideas on various topics. I don't agree with everything in this video, but a lot of it is very good information that you'll never see covered in MSM reports. It's good to stay informed and to get information from alternative sources. It helps you to be free and less socially-conditioned...
These videos are each about 2.5 hours, so make sure you set aside time to view them. This is critical information that you need to know.
These videos are each about 2.5 hours, so make sure you set aside time to view them. This is critical information that you need to know.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)